Mutual Fund Expense Lies

When purchasing mutual funds we are cautioned to read the prospectus, look at past performance, check out the fund manager's record and see what their expense ratios have been.

We are also told that we should not buy funds with expenses exceeding 1% to 1.5%. When you ask the fund salesman (don't forget he's a salesman) he will assure you that the fund expenses are whatever is shown in the prospectus. He is telling you the truth, but not the whole truth, according the Securities and Exchange regulations. In many cases he has left out a big chuck of expenses.

The 1.5% expense means you are paying $150 each year of every $10,000 you have invested with that fund. The lower the expense is the more of your money is at work. As a fund becomes larger meaning they take in more money the expense ratio should drop, but it rarely does.he fund manager must make 1.5% to have your money stay even.

If you can find your way around the Securities and Exchange Commission internet web site you will find that the definition of expense ratio leaves out commission charges. Many funds will turn over their portfolio by 100% in a year. Obviously they are not going to buy and sell at no charge. The floor broker must be paid a commission for each share that is executed.

Sometimes brokerage fees are purposely inflated and the broker kicks back favors(they don't call it that) such as research information, free computers and other favors. Been to the Hampton's or Hawaii for that all-expense weekend seminar? Course not.

The SEC does not require that this commission cost be disclosed as an expense. Why? Their answer is pure government hokum, "We exclude brokerage costs because we have always excluded brokerage costs". This is the SEC that is supposed to be the watchdog for the investor.

Leaving out this important fact will hide another .25 to .50 cents or more in some cases in expenses that you are paying for. When you call the fund to ask if their brokerage commissions are included the person to whom you are speaking probably won't understand and will give you the standard answer that the number shown in the Prospectus is correct. Getting a true answer is like pulling an impacted wisdom tooth. If you can get one.

Brokerage commissions are known to the penny and could easily be included in the prospectus, but these "soft dollars" as they are known are not made public to the investors seem to disappear.

Fund managers say these costs are insignificant and that investors should look at the fund's performance. If they did that and really understood what they were looking at they probably wouldn't buy 90% of the domestic stock funds.

This is just another example of how the investor has the wool pulled over his eyes and another reason I find prospectuses worthless.

Al Thomas' best selling book, "If It Doesn't Go Up, Don't Buy It!" has helped thousands of people make money and keep their profits with his simple 2-step method. Read the first chapter and receive his market letter for 3 months at http://www.mutualfundmagic.com and discover why he's the man that Wall Street does not want you to know. Copyright 2005

Decoding Dick Davis Digest Cabot Wealth Advisory, MA - 8 hours ago For investors interested in more than just individual stocks, mutual funds and ETFs are also covered in the Digest. Diversification is an important ...

Law School to Provide Tax Help Inside INdiana Business (press release), IN - Jan 5, 2009 Taxpayers with annual income of $42000 or less are eligible for the help if they have not received income from the sale of stocks, mutual funds or homes or ...

$72 billion was pulled from market in October The Tennessean, TN - Dec 24, 2008 By ES Browning • THE WALL STREET JOURNAL • December 24, 2008 One of the hallmarks of the long market downturns in the 1930s and the 1970s has returned: ...

Valparaiso University law school to provide tax help nwitimes.com, IN - Jan 5, 2009 Taxpayers with annual income of $42000 or less are eligible for the help if they have not received income from the sale of stocks, mutual funds or homes or ...

New Money features for you USA Today - Dec 15, 2008 They include: •Year-to-date returns for stocks, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). These can be found by entering the name or ticker symbol in ...

Like other stocks, mutual funds show heavy losses during 2008 LubbockOnline.com, TX - Dec 27, 2008 By Tim Paradis | AP NEW YORK - There was one safe bet that mutual fund investors could make in 2008 - that the stock market was a place to lose a lot of ...

High school investments team wins game Greenwich Post, CT - Jan 4, 2009 The Greenwich High School investment course is more akin to a college-level course covering stocks, mutual funds, bonds and other securities. ...

Value? Growth? Both! Motley Fool - Jan 2, 2009 The distinction between value and growth stocks is such a bedrock assumption that Morningstar routinely classifies stocks, mutual funds, and ETFs as one or ...

Be wary of US treasury bonds in 2009 Stockhouse, Canada - Jan 5, 2009 They pulled money out of stocks, mutual funds, money market accounts, even bank savings accounts and CD’s, and poured it into US T-bills and bonds at a ...

City pension funds may cost taxpayers Allentown Morning Call, PA - Jan 4, 2009 ... the crumbling economy has pummeled Allentown's pension funds, which rely on stocks, mutual funds, real estate and other investment tools for growth. ...